Koene AR. (2006). A model for perceptual averaging and stochastic bistable behavior and the role of voluntary control. Neural computation. 18 [PubMed]

See more from authors: Koene AR

References and models cited by this paper

Bear MF, Malenka RC. (1994). Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Current opinion in neurobiology. 4 [PubMed]

Blake R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological review. 96 [PubMed]

Borsellino A, De Marco A, Allazetta A, Rinesi S, Bartolini B. (1972). Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik. 10 [PubMed]

Brascamp JW, van Ee R, Pestman WR, van den Berg AV. (2005). Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of vision. 5 [PubMed]

Budd JM, Kisvárday ZF. (2001). Local lateral connectivity of inhibitory clutch cells in layer 4 of cat visual cortex (area 17). Experimental brain research. 140 [PubMed]

Chong SC, Tadin D, Blake R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of vision. 5 [PubMed]

Crook JM, Kisvárday ZF, Eysel UT. (1998). Evidence for a contribution of lateral inhibition to orientation tuning and direction selectivity in cat visual cortex: reversible inactivation of functionally characterized sites combined with neuroanatomical tracing techniques. The European journal of neuroscience. 10 [PubMed]

Dayan P. (1998). A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural computation. 10 [PubMed]

Ditzinger T, Haken H. (1989). Oscillations in the perception of ambiguous patterns Biol Cybernet. 61

Ernst MO, Banks MS. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 415 [PubMed]

Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in cognitive sciences. 8 [PubMed]

Fox R, Herrmann J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations Percept Psychophys. 2

Goryo K, Robinson JO, Wilson JA. (1984). Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception. 13 [PubMed]

Gómez C, Argandoña ED, Solier RG, Angulo JC, Vázquez M. (1995). Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures. Brain and cognition. 29 [PubMed]

HUBEL DH, WIESEL TN. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. The Journal of physiology. 148 [PubMed]

Hayashi R, Maeda T, Shimojo S, Tachi S. (2004). An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry. Vision research. 44 [PubMed]

Hol K, Koene A, van Ee R. (2003). Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of vision. 3 [PubMed]

Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. (1979). Brain mechanisms of vision. Sci Am. 241

Kawamoto AH, Anderson JA. (1985). A neural network model of multistable perception. Acta psychologica. 59 [PubMed]

Lack LC. (1978). Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry.

Laing CR, Chow CC. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of computational neuroscience. 12 [PubMed]

Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision research. 35 [PubMed]

Lee SH. (2004). Binocular battles on multiple fronts. Trends in cognitive sciences. 8 [PubMed]

Lehky SR. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception. 17 [PubMed]

Lehky SR. (1995). Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proceedings. Biological sciences. 259 [PubMed]

Lehky SR, Blake R. (1991). Organization of binocular pathways: Modeling and data related to rivalry Neural Comput. 3

Lehky SR, Sejnowski TJ. (1990). Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 10 [PubMed]

Levelt WJM. (1966). The alternation process in binocular rivalry Brit J Physiol. 57

Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature. 380 [PubMed]

Lumer ED. (1998). A neural model of binocular integration and rivalry based on the coordination of action-potential timing in primary visual cortex. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 8 [PubMed]

Lund JS, Angelucci A, Bressloff PC. (2003). Anatomical substrates for functional columns in macaque monkey primary visual cortex. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 13 [PubMed]

Marshall JA, Kalarickal GJ. (2000). Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry Neurocomput. 32

Matsuoka K. (1984). The dynamic model of binocular rivalry. Biological cybernetics. 49 [PubMed]

Meng M, Tong F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of vision. 4 [PubMed]

Merk I, Schnakenberg J. (2002). A stochastic model of multistable visual perception. Biological cybernetics. 86 [PubMed]

Moldakarimov S, Rollenhagen JE, Olson CR, Chow CC. (2005). Competitive dynamics in cortical responses to visual stimuli. Journal of neurophysiology. 94 [PubMed]

Mueller TJ. (1990). A physiological model of binocular rivalry. Visual neuroscience. 4 [PubMed]

Mueller TJ, Blake R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological cybernetics. 61 [PubMed]

Oruç I, Maloney LT, Landy MS. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision research. 43 [PubMed]

Palmer SE. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology.

Poggio T, Marr D. (1977). A computational theory of human stereo disparity Science. 194

Rogers BJ, Howard IP. (2002). Seeing in depth Depth Perception. 2

Rumelhart DE, Mcclelland JL. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings Psychol Rev. 88

Shulman GL. (1992). Attentional modulation of a figural aftereffect. Perception. 21 [PubMed]

Stollenwerk L, Bode M. (2003). Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry. Neural computation. 15 [PubMed]

Sugie N. (1982). Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry Biol Cybernet. 43

Suzuki S, Grabowecky M. (2002). Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron. 36 [PubMed]

Tong F, Brouwer GJ, Schwarzbach J, Van_Ee R. (2004). Neural correlates of stereoscopic depth perception in visual cortex Soc Neurosci Abstr 664.13.

Toppino TC. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & psychophysics. 65 [PubMed]

Treue S, Hol K, Rauber HJ. (2000). Seeing multiple directions of motion-physiology and psychophysics. Nature neuroscience. 3 [PubMed]

Tsal Y. (1984). A Mueller-Lyer illusion induced by selective attention. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology. 36 [PubMed]

Van Essen DC, Anderson CH, Felleman DJ. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science (New York, N.Y.). 255 [PubMed]

Vickers D. (1972). A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation. Perception. 1 [PubMed]

Wilson HR. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 [PubMed]

Wilson HR, Blake R, Lee SH. (2001). Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature. 412 [PubMed]

Zhou YH, Gao JB, White KD, Merk I, Yao K. (2004). Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biological cybernetics. 90 [PubMed]

van Dam LC, van Ee R. (2005). The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision research. 45 [PubMed]

van Ee R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision research. 45 [PubMed]

van Ee R, Adams WJ, Mamassian P. (2003). Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision. 20 [PubMed]

van Ee R, Krumina G, Pont S, van der Ven S. (2005). Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces. Proceedings. Biological sciences. 272 [PubMed]

van Ee R, van Dam LC, Brouwer GJ. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision research. 45 [PubMed]

van Ee R, van Dam LC, Erkelens CJ. (2002). Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. Journal of vision. 2 [PubMed]

References and models that cite this paper
This website requires cookies and limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By continuing to browse or otherwise use this site, you are agreeing to this use. See our Privacy policy and how to cite and terms of use.